Tips for Working on a College Group Project

Tips for Working on a College Group Project Gathering ventures in school can be incredible encounters or bad dreams. From others not conveying their weight to holding up to the latest possible time, bunch ventures can rapidly transform into a superfluously enormous and monstrous issue. By following the essential tips underneath, in any case, you can work to guarantee that your gathering venture prompts an incredible evaluation rather than a monstrous cerebral pain. Set Roles and Goals Early It might appear to be senseless and fundamental, however defining jobs and objectives early will assist tremendously as the task advances. Determine who is doing what (research? composing? introducing?), with however much detail as could be expected and with dates and cutoff times when suitable. All things considered, realizing that one of your gathering individuals will finish some portion of the papers research wont do any great on the off chance that he finishes it after the undertaking due date. Permit a Time Cushion toward the End of Your Schedule Lets state the task is expected on the tenth of the month. Mean to have everything done by the fifth or the seventh, as a sanity check. All things considered, life occurs: individuals become ill, documents get lost, bunch individuals piece. Taking into account a little pad will help forestall significant pressure (and a potential disaster) on the real due date. Orchestrate Periodic Check-ins and Updates You might be working your you-comprehend what off to complete your piece of the venture, yet not every person might be as steady. Orchestrate to meet as a gathering each other week to refresh one another, talk about how the undertaking is going, or even simply take a shot at things together. Along these lines, everybody will know the gathering, all in all, is on target before it turns out to be past the point where it is possible to fix the issue. Permit Time for Someone to Check the Final Project With such a large number of individuals taking a shot at a venture, things can regularly appear to be detached or befuddling. Check in with a grounds composing focus, another gathering, your educator, or any other individual who might be useful to survey your last undertaking before you turn it in. An additional arrangement of eyes can be significant for a major venture that will affect such huge numbers of people groups grades. Converse with Your Professor in the event that Someone isnt Pitching In One negative part of doing bunch ventures is the likelihood that one part (or more!) isn't contributing to help the remainder of the gathering. Despite the fact that you may feel off-kilter about doing as such, realize that its OK to check in with your educator about whats occurring (or not occurring). You can do this halfway through the task or toward the end. Most educators will need to know and, on the off chance that you check in halfway through the undertaking, they may have the option to offer you some guidance regarding how to push ahead.

Greek Influence on English Language

Roundabout and direct borrowings Since the living Greek and English dialects were not in direct contact until present day times, borrowings were fundamentally backhanded, coming either through Latin (through writings or different vernaculars), or from Ancient Greek writings, not the living language. Some Greek words were acquired into Latin and its relatives, the Romance dialects. English regularly got these words from French. Their phonetic and orthographic structure has once in a while changed considerably.For instance,â placeâ was obtained both by Old English and by French from Latinâ platea, itself acquired from Greek ( ) ‘broad (road)'; the Italianâ piazzaâ and Spanishâ plazaâ have a similar inception, and have been acquired into English in equal. The wordâ oliveâ comes through the Romance from the Latin wordâ oliva, which thusly originates from the Greek (elaiwa). [1][2] A later Greek word,â (bouturon)[3]â becomes Latinâ butyrumâ and in the en d Englishâ butter. A huge gathering of early borrowings, again transmitted first through Latin, at that point through different vernaculars, originates from Christian vocabulary:â bishopâ < episkoposâ ‘overseer'),â priestâ < (presbyterosâ ‘elder'), andâ churchâ <â ? (kyriakon). [4] In a few cases, the orthography of these words was later changed to mirror the Greek spelling:â e. g. quireâ was respelled asâ choirâ in the seventeenth century. A lot more words were obtained by researchers writing in post-old style Latin. A few words were acquired in basically their unique significance, frequently transmitted through old style Latin:â physics,iambic,â eta,â necromancy. A couple of result from scribal errors:â encyclopediaâ < ‘the hover of learning', not a compound in Greek;â acneâ (skin condition) < incorrect lt; ‘high point, zenith'. Others were acquired unaltered as specialized terms, however with explic it, novel meanings:â telescopeâ < ‘far-seeing' alludes to anâ optical instrument for seeing far away;â phlogistonâ < ‘burnt thing' is a supposedâ fire-production potential. In any case, by a long shot the biggest Greek commitment to English jargon is the gigantic number of logical, clinical, and technicalâ neologismsâ that have been authored byâ compounding Greek roots and affixesto produce novel words which never existed in the Greek language:â utopiaâ (1516, ‘not' + ‘place'),â zoologyâ (1669, ), hydrodynamicsâ (1738, + ), photography(1834, + ), oocyteâ (1895, + ), helicobacterâ (1989, + ). Such terms are authored in all the European dialects, and spread to the others freelyâ€including to Modern Greek. Generally, these coinages were developed utilizing just Greek morphemes,â e. g. metamathematics, however progressively, Greek, Latin, and different morphemes are consolidated, as intelevision (Greek †+ Latin v ision), metalinguistic (Greek + Latinâ linguaâ + Greek - + Greek - ), and garbology (English garbage + Greek - . Theseâ hybrid wordsâ were once viewed as ‘barbarisms'. Numerous Greek joins such asâ anti- andâ -icâ have becomeâ productiveâ in English, consolidating with subjective English words: antichoice, Fascistic. Most learned borrowings and coinages follow the old style Latin Romanization framework, where ‘c' speaks to ? and so forth , with a couple exceptions:â eurekaâ (cf. heuristic),â kineticâ (cf. cinematography),kryptonâ (cf. obscure). Some Greek words were acquired through Arabic and afterward Romance:â alchemyâ ( or ), elixirâ ( ), alembicâ ( ), botargoâ ( , and possiblyâ quintalâ ( < Latincentenarium (pondus)). Curiously,â chemistâ appears to be aâ back-formationâ fromâ alchemist. In the nineteenth and twentieth hundreds of years a couple of educated words and expressions were presented utilizing a pr etty much direct transliteration of Ancient Greek (as opposed to the conventional Latin-based morphology and dropped inflectional endings),â e. g. nousâ ( ), hoi polloiâ ( ). Some Greek words have given ascent toâ etymological doublets, being acquired both through a natural, backhanded course, and an educated, direct course into English:â anthemâ andâ antiphonâ ( ,franticâ andâ freneticâ ( ), butterâ andâ butyr(ic)â ( ), bishopâ andâ episcop(al)â ( ), balmâ andâ balsamâ ( , likely itself a getting from Semitic),â blameâ andâ blasphemy( ), boxâ andâ pyx(is)â ( ), choirâ andâ chorusâ ( ), trivetâ andâ tripodâ (/ - ), slanderâ andâ scandalâ ( ), oil,â olive,â oleum, andâ elaeo- ( ); almondâ andâ amygdala( ); dramâ andâ drachmaâ ( ); paperâ andâ papyrusâ ( ); caratâ andâ keratinâ ( , - ). [5][6] Finally, with the development of the travel industry, a few words reflecting current Greek ulture have been obtained into Englishâ€many of them initially borrowings into Greek themselves:â retsina,â souvlaki,tavernaâ (< Italian),â ouzoâ (disputed etymology),â moussakaâ (< Turkish < Arabic),â baklavaâ (< Turkish),â fetaâ (< Italian),â bouzoukiâ (< Turkish),â gyroâ (the food, a calque of Turkishâ doner). â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€- [edit]Greek as a middle person Many words from the Hebrew Bibleâ were transmitted toward the western dialects through the Greek of the Septuagint, frequently without morphological regularization:â pharaohâ ( ), seraphim( , , paradiseâ ( < Hebrew < Persian),â rabbiâ ( ). â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€- [edit]The composed type of Greek words in English Many Greek words, particularly those acquired through the abstract convention, are conspicuous as such from their spelling. As of now in Latin, there were explicit shows for getting Greek. So Greekâ ? was composed as ‘y',â as ‘? ‘,â as ‘? ‘,â ? as ‘ph', andâ ? as ‘c'. These shows (which initially reflected elocution) have extended into English and different dialects with authentic orthography (like French).They make it conceivable to perceive expressions of Greek starting point, and give indicates regarding their articulation and enunciation. Then again, the spelling of certain words was refashioned to mirror their etymology: Middle Englishâ caracterâ becameâ characterâ in the sixteenth century. [7] The Ancient Greek diphthongsâ andâ might be spelled in three distinct manners in English: the digraphsâ aeâ andâ oe; the ligaturesâ ? andâ ? ; or the basic letterâ e. Both the digraphs and ligatures are unprecedented in American utilization, yet the digraphs stay normal in British use. Models are: reference book/encyclop? ia/reference book, hemoglobin/h? moglobin/hemoglobin, oedema/? dema/edema, Oedipus/? dipus/Edipus (uncommon). The verbal endingâ -is spelledâ -izeâ in American English andâ -iseâ orâ -izeâ in British English. Now and again, a word's spelling obviously shows its Greek starting point. In the event that it includesâ phâ or includesâ yâ between consonants, it is likely Greek. In the event that it includesâ rrh,â phth, orâ chth; or begins withâ hy-, ps-, pn-, orâ chr-; or the rarerâ pt-, ct-, chth-, rh-, x-, sth-, mn-, tm-, gn- orâ bd-, then it is Greek, with some exceptions: gnat, gnaw, gneiss.One special case isâ ptarmigan, which is from a Gaelic word, theâ phaving been included byâ false historical underpinnings. The wordâ trophy, however at last of Greek starting point, didn't have aâ ? in any case, aâ ? in its Greek structure, . â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€- [edit]Pronunciation In bunches such asâ ps-, pn- , orâ gn- which are not permitted by English phonotactics, the typical English elocution drops the principal consonant (e. g. brain research) toward the beginning of a word; comparegnosticâ [n? st? k] andâ agnosticâ [? gn? st? k]; there are a couple exceptions:â tmesisâ [tmi? s? s].Initial x- is pronouncedâ z. Châ is articulated likeâ kâ rather than as in â€Å"church†:â e. g. character, turmoil. Successive vowels are frequently articulated independently as opposed to shaping a solitary vowel sound or one of them getting quiet (e. g. â€Å"theatre†Ã¢ vs. â€Å"feat†). â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€- [edit]Inflectional endings and plurals Though numerous English words got from Greek through the artistic course drop the inflectional endings (tripod,â zoology,â pentagon) or utilize Latin endings (papyrus,â mausoleum), some protect the Greek endings:â tetrahedron,â schemaâ (cf. cheme),â topo s,â lexicon,â climax. On account of Greek endings, the plurals now and again follow the Greek rules:â phenomenon, phenomena;â tetrahedron, tetrahedra;â crisis, crises;â hypothesis, hypotheses;â stigma, stigmata;â topos, topoi;â cyclops, cyclopes; however regularly do not:â colon, colonsâ notâ *colaâ (except for theâ very uncommon specialized term of rhetoric);pentathlon, pentathlonsâ notâ *pentathla;â demon, demonsâ notâ *demones;â climaxes, not *climaces.Usage is blended in some cases:â schema, schemasâ orâ schemata;â lexicon, lexiconsâ orâ lexica;â helix, helixesâ orâ helices;â sphinx, sphingesâ orâ sphinxes;â clitoris, clitorisesâ orâ clitorides. What's more, there are deluding cases:â pentagonâ comes from Greekâ pentagonon, so its plural can't beâ *pentaga; it ispentagons (Greek /pentagona). (cf. Plurals from

Ritualistic File-Sharing free essay sample

This paper clarifies how the protected innovation laws are overlooked on Napster, Kazaa, Gnutella and other record sharing systems. This exposition is a top to bottom examination of record sharing innovation (Napster, Kazaa) and its connection to current licensed innovation laws. So as to structure the investigation, hypothetical work from two unmistakable interchanges researchers Harold Innis and James Carey is utilized. These creators isolated media into two kinds: Innis sorted media as either time-one-sided or space one-sided, while Carey said media was either custom or transmission. Custom/time-one-sided media oppose control and protected innovation laws, and record sharing systems are custom and time-one-sided. This article characterizes the mechanism of record sharing systems, licensed innovation, the terms utilized by Innis and Carey, and shows how the idea of the medium clarifies why protected innovation laws are disregarded on document sharing systems. From the paper: From a cutting edge, educated, viewpoint the current financial and lawful discussion over record sharing is an overflowing with inconsistencies. We will compose a custom paper test on Formal File-Sharing or on the other hand any comparable subject explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page The vast majority consider the idea of shoplifting a CD disgusting, yet a significant number of those equivalent individuals wouldn?t falter to acquire a duplicate from a companion or download a tune from a total outsider. What is the reason for this division? Would one be able to be a customer and a hoodlum simultaneously? This exposition suggests that answers can be found by looking at the media being referred to. Most present day examination of this subject, basic and legitimate, is established in one explicit point of view, however media researchers like Harold Innis and James Carey have in reality proposed two. Intelligently and truly, protected innovation rights show up in one and not the other. The accompanying pages will characterize the medium being referred to and the two points of view. Next these definitions will be utilized to put the medium in the most suitable edge. When the medium is sorted, crafted by Innis and Carey will be applied to show how the idea of the medium decides the job of protected innovation.

Dartmouth College Leadership

Dartmouth College Leadership November 29, 2012 New Dartmouth College leadership was announced today by the Chair of the Dartmouth College Board of Trustees. Taking over at the helm of the Ivy League institution will be Philip J. Hanlon, PhD. Hanlon, a Dartmouth alumnus of the Class of 1977, comes from the University of Michigan where he currently serves as provost and executive vice president for academic affairs. He is also the Donald J. Lewis Professor of Mathematics at the university. Dr. Hanlon will take office in July, succeeding interim Dartmouth president Carol Folt, who will assume her old gig as the college provost. Folt, as youll remember, was named interim president after Jim Kim resigned when appointed by President Obama to take charge of the World Bank. It is no surprise that Dartmouth has turned to an academic with an extensive university administrative background. Many were critical of Jim Kim (though not us at Ivy Coach) for only staying a couple of years at Dartmouth and basically using it as a platform for higher office. Kim also had little university leadership experience he was definitely an outside-the-box choice (but we believe a good one who brought great attention to the College on the Hill). Dr. Hanlon is also a notable academic in such fields as cryptology, computational genetics, and bioinformatics. He holds a bachelors from Dartmouth and a PhD from Caltech. He previously taught at MIT. Dr. Hanlon is the president-elect of Dartmouth College (photo from Dartmouth College). Writes Chair of the Dartmouth College Board of Trustees Steve Mandel in a letter to the Dartmouth community, A University of Michigan faculty member since 1986, Phil has held administrative leadership positions for more than a decade. As provost, he is the chief academic officer and chief budgetary officer of the university and is responsible for sustaining its academic excellence in teaching, research, and creative endeavors. Previously, as vice provost, Phil was instrumental in putting in place measures to ensure that higher education remains affordable regardless of income. He also led campus-wide initiatives on multidisciplinary learning and team teaching at the undergraduate level and established new policies and processes designed to make more effective use of space and facilities. Phil is also a passionate teacher with an unshakeable conviction in the power of a broad liberal arts education. He believes it is our role to produce citizen leaders with the creativity, entrepreneurial spirit, cultural awareness, and flexibility to make a difference in today’s world. He continues to teach first-year calculus at Michigan, where he has been honored with an Arthur F. Thurnau Professorship, the university’s highest recognition of faculty whose commitment to undergraduate teaching has had a demonstrable impact on the intellectual development and lives of their students. Phil plans to continue to teach at Dartmouth, based on his strong belief that great universities are distinguished by their focus on preparing the next generation of leaders for a lifetime of impact and learning.

Syrian Civil War Explained

John Stuart Mill And Aristotle - 2772 Words

John Stuart Mill and Aristotle both address the idea of happiness as the goal of human life. They explain that all human action is at the foundation of their moral theories. Mill addresses the Greatest Happiness Principle, which is the greatest amount of pleasure to the least amount of pain. Similarly, Aristotle addresses happiness through the idea of eudaimonia and human flourishing. According to Aristotle, eudaimonia is happiness, it is the state of contemplation that individuals are in when they have reached actualized happiness. Also referred to as happiness or human flourishing, it is the ultimate goal of human beings. Happiness is â€Å"living well and acting well.† He explains that once general happiness becomes recognized as the moral standard, natural sentiment will nurture feelings that promote utilitarianism. According to Aristotle, happiness is a state of being. Both Mill and Aristotle agree that in order to attain true happiness, human beings must eng age in activities that are distinct to humans and that make them happy. Aristotle’s idea of eudaimonia and human flourishing is a more compelling argument than Mill’s for happiness and the final end because Aristotle explains that the virtues bring human beings to happiness. Aristotle believes that happiness is an activity â€Å"in accord with virtue.† Happiness is in accord with the most excellent virtue. All men agreed that happiness is to â€Å"live well†, but Aristotle expands this further into a wholeShow MoreRelatedComparing Aristotle And John Stuart Mill1130 Words   |  5 Pagesconcentrate of the famous works of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. After meticulously analyzing each of the above philosophers’ texts, I personally prefer the position of utilitarian and Benthamite, John Stuart Mill. After comparing and contrasting the positions and reasonings of these philosophers, I will demonstrate my own reasons why I have chosen John Stuart Mill as the most established in his theory of the role of pleasure in morality. Aristotle was a particularly influentialRead MoreEssay about Aristotle and John Stuart Mill on Happiness and Morality1777 Words   |  8 PagesAristotle and John Stuart Mill on Happiness and Morality In this paper I will argue that Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia disproves Mill’s utilitarian view that pleasure is the â€Å"greatest good.† The purpose of this paper is to contrast Aristotle’s and Mills views on the value of happiness and its link to morality. First I will describe Aristotle’s model of eudaimonia. Then I will present Mill’s utilitarian views on happiness and morality. Lastly, I will provide a counterargument to Mill’sRead MoreImmanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle: Morals and Ethical Codes1169 Words   |  5 Pages Morals and ethics is, of course, a subject that runs deep in the discussion of philosophy. People are faced with moral dilemmas everyday, which many times society decides without thoroughly exploring their options. Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Plato, and Aristotle are philosophers that focus on the topic of ethics, yet all have different outlooks. Kant is considered a non-consequentiality, which means he feels the intentions motives, and good will is more important than the resultsRead MoreAristotle Vs. Mill : The Debate On Happiness1750 Words   |  7 PagesAristotle v. Mill: The Debate On Happiness Is there really one definition for what it means to be truly happy? A simple joy such as a piece of candy may bring happiness to one; whereas something much larger might be the determining factor for another’s happiness. The definition of happiness is one of the most debated questions among many different philosophers and people through out the ages. Aristotle and John Stuart Mill are two philosophers who had similar ideas regarding the definition of happinessRead MoreJohn Locke And John Stuart Mill s On Liberty Essay1748 Words   |  7 Pagesas, Aristotle and Plato have more of an ancient conception of liberty and the role the individual plays in society and to the state. Whereas, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill have developed a more modernized conception of liberty and the role of the individual to the state and society. Plato’s work the Republic, and Aristotle’s works of literature Nicomachean Ethics, and Politics will be contrasted against Th omas Hobbes’ Leviathan, John Locke’s Second Treatise, and John Stuart Mill’sRead MoreJohn Locke And John Stuart Mill s On Liberty Essay1200 Words   |  5 Pagesas, Aristotle and Plato have more of an ancient conception of liberty and the role the individual plays in society and to the state. Whereas, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill have developed a more modernized conception of liberty and the role of the individual to the state and society. Plato’s work the Republic, and Aristotle’s works of literature Nicomachean Ethics, and Politics will be contrasted against Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, John Locke’s Second Treatise, and John Stuart Mill’sRead MoreJohn Stewart Mill and Aristotle on Happiness647 Words   |  3 Pagesman have been the foundations to modern philosophical thought. Aristotle and John Stuart Mill aimed to explain the origin to happiness, and their respective conclusions also resulted in the definit ion of morality; these conclusions also affected their view of women. Aristotle believed that it was the function of women to remain subservient to men so that man (the citizen) could flourish and provide the good life for the Polis, whereas Mill denotes that equality between men and women produces happinessRead MoreAristotle s Philosophy Of Morality And The Final Goal Of Human Life Essay1895 Words   |  8 PagesAristotle on Ethics The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle s key study of morality and the final goal of human life, has for many years been a popular and persuasive book. It offers the modern reader many useful insights into human desires and behavior despite being thousands of years old. The overarching theme behind this book is Aristotle s assertion that there are no recognized unconditional moral standards and that every ethical theory must take into consideration an understanding of psychologyRead Moreâ€Å"Are You Happy Now?† Essay1541 Words   |  7 Pagescontentment† . Even Aristotle acknowledges that everyone disagrees on the definition of happiness because we all have a different thought-process and prior knowledge. Even though there are many definitions to happiness, both Aristotle and John Stuart Mill take a similar approach when attempting to define happiness in their books. Aristotle and Mill discuss their theories of happiness and pleasure, and their views of virtue in ethics and its relation to happiness. Aristotle and Mill may have been writingRead MoreReconciling Moral Theories889 Words   |  4 Pagesthe compatibility of their particulars can be a daunting task. Determining the compatibility of John Stuart Mill’s modern moral theory of utilitarianism with Aristotle’s pre-modern moral philosophy will involve an in-depth exploration for each moral philosophy, comparing and contrasting the smallest details of each. To start, an understanding of Aristotelian moral philosophy is fundamental. Aristotle basesd his theory on the concepts of â€Å"virtue,† coming from the Greek word â€Å"arà ªte† meaning â€Å"excellence†

Enterprise Analysis and Modeling Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Enterprise Analysis and Modeling. Answer: Change Agents Business Analysts are also referred as Change Agents. Majority of the individuals find this role very distressing and even, bewildering. Most of the business analysts are from finance or Information Technology backgrounds, with no formal or little training in human resource, organizational development or psychology. Eventually, they view the related topics like change management as incredibly blurry or fuzzy ones. In addition to this, the topics of change management usually involve higher uncertainty level, which might go against the methodical thinking pattern. This usually prefers structure, predictability and order. According to Fullan (2012), the business analyst is implicitly or explicitly responsible for the adoption of the changed processes, technologies and products within the organization, in a successful manner. Project Leader The business analyst serves as one of the major project leaders as he/she works on the gaps or areas that have been overlooked in the innovation or transformation projects. A business analyst directs more attention to several parts of the business like integrating strategic planning with the planning for technology directions and information systems. The business analysts also play a major role in planning and monitoring the projects, identifying stakeholder, estimating and defining activities, monitoring the work and other factors (Nixon, Harrington and Parker 2012). Visionary The business analysts of the organization are also regarded as the visionary of the business. The analysts are focused on helping the stakeholders of the organization in order to improve their operations as well as processes. They should be able to understand their current positions, identify the requirements and also engage others in order to help deliver the innovative solutions to clients or customers. Business analysts act as the visionary of the organizations and by finding better ways they make their own practices better in order to increase the organizational value. Furthermore, the business analysts experiment with the existing ideas and present new ones, which in turn benefits the business (Zoet and Versendaal 2013). Credible Leader The business analysts also act as a credible leader of the organization. He/she needs to develop or sustain the credibility of the business at higher level. Organizations or companies seek for credible business analysts. They are the ones, with whom the organizational managers can associate. Moreover, business analysts are trustworthy, sincere, creative and reliable. He/she can always develop his/her credibility by gaining knowledge and proficiency in these leadership skills. The business analysts also assist the organizational managers by facilitating the teams in an effective and efficient manner (Orsagh 2012). Trusted Leader The business analysts are being trusted by the organizations. They strive to be the reliable source of information. The credibility of the business analysts comprises both expertise and trustworthiness. In addition to this, the employees often judge credibility on certain factors like physical appearances, enthusiasm and others. In the end, ethics, integrity and professional presence are considered to be the major factors of credibility. Therefore, credibility has always been on the top of management agenda. Being a trusted leader, the business analysts are required to believe in others capability and motivate them to perform better every day (Nixon, Harrington and Parker 2012). References Fullan, M., 2012.Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Routledge. Nixon, P., Harrington, M. and Parker, D., 2012. Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis.International Journal of productivity and performance management,61(2), pp.204-216. Orsagh, M., 2012. Visionary Board Leadership: Stewardship for the Long Term. Zoet, M. and Versendaal, J., 2013. Business Rules Management Solutions Problem Space: Situational Factors. InPACIS(p. 247).